We are excited to announce that we are now ready to reveal an agriculture technology that we named High-rise Agriculture(TM).This system is based on growing plants upwards instead of the typical ground level. We are claiming that an upward plant growth system could increase plant growth production per square footage of any given field. We are claiming that our system would be able to grow an extra percentage of 10's, 100's, or more within the same area where a farmer is growing only one today. This extra plant production could then be used to relieve world hunger or as an energy fuel source.

We believe that high-rise agriculture systems could bring world food relief to not only the human population, but also the environment.

Most idealist countries are now seeking fuel relief through the use of bio-fuel alternatives. A world wide increase of bio-fuels should also be of concern with todays basic farming system because the reality is that the plants need to produce the necessary fuel could end up being removed from food plates. To make an explanation of this, let us point out that just in the United States alone there are 97-107 ethanol plants in production and could build 33-56 more by the end of the year. The U S produces 4,336.4 million gallons of ethanol a year and should produce another 1,778 mgy more. An ethanol increase production like this should be of concern because it could mean that certain daily food plants could become too expensive as a food item.

We understand that there are other none edible plants that could also be used as a bio-fuel source and the idea might be to used them instead of food plants. The reality is that even if none edible plants are used as the main fuel source, they could still affect the world food supply prices because some farmers would stop producing certain food plants in order to make space to grow the none edible fuel ones.

The U S could approximately produce 7,000 million gallons of ethanol per year and yet it is not enough to cause a ripple within the amount that is truly needed. In fact, President George W. Bush called for Americans to cut their gasoline use by 20 percent by 2017 through the use of home-grown fuels such as ethanol. In his January 23 State of the Union address, Bush proposed his Twenty in Ten plan on energy to reduce U.S. gasoline usage and mandate the use of 132 billion liters of renewable and other alternative fuels by 2017.

The need for action is clear, Bush said, citing continued U.S. dependence on the global oil market, as well as concern that burning oil and gasoline creates air pollution and greenhouse gases. President Bush said, the U.S. should reduce gasoline consumption by 20 percent by tightening fuel economy standards and producing 35 billion gallons of renewable fuel such as ethanol by 2017. "This dependence leaves us more vulnerable to hostile regimes, and to terrorists - who could cause huge disruptions of oil shipments, raise the price of oil, and do great harm to our economy," Bush said.
President Bush says he is seeking $2.7 billion in the 2008 fiscal year budget and $10 billion over the next five years for alternative energy research as part of his proposal to reduce U.S. gasoline usage by 20 percent within ten years. Bush said the funding amount would constitute a 53 percent increase over the 2006 funding level and would expand research on fuel sources such as ethanol, biodiesel, lithium-ion batteries and hydrogen fuel cells.

We have been working with these types of high-rise agriculture experiments for some time and we are firm to announce that an upward plant growing system would be able to reduce or eliminate President Bush's concerns. We feel that only a technology with the capabilities to produce an increase of crop production per square footage of field would be able to solve the most important problems mentioned. We also believe that such a system would preserve delicate nature environments that would other wise be burnt and plowed towards the high biofuel world demands.

We are curently working on two types of agriculture systems and the first one to be revealed is based on the discovery of a new formulated dirt or top soil. Our lab department developed an economical formulated dirt that has a cement type of characteristic but yet the plant's root systems are still able to grow and develop. The result is a safe cement type of dirt made from all natural ingredients that could be best explained as a much stronger adobe dirt formula.

The concept of creating a high-rise agriculture system would be to use the cement-like formulated dirt to build walls across the fields and then to use the walls to grow the plants on.
For example: the right drawing represents a basic farm field with a crop of 140 plants

On the other hand, the right drawing represents the same size field as the basic farm with the exception that High-rise walls made from the formulated dirt were built across the field to grow the plants on. Although the walls were just high enough to only allow one extra plant on either side, they were large enough to grow the 140 plants produced by the basic farm plus over 200% more plant growth. This means that this small wall system was able to produce the original 140 plus an extra 308 plants for a total of 448 plants.

Another example would be a higher wall type of agriculture system that would be able to produce not only the original 140 plants from that of the original basic farm, but also an extra 300% plus more plants. This system would produce the original 140 plants from that of the basic farm plus an extra 448 plants. This is a total of 588 plants.

It is very clear that the higher the wall system, the more plant growth production. This type of High-rise Agriculture Tower system has the potential to grow the 140 plants plus 500% more plant growth from that of the same size basic farm field. For example: the 14 high-rise agriculture towers are able to produce the same 140 plants from that of the basic farm plus an extra 700 plants. This would equal to 840 plants and would be equivalent to the plant production of 6 basic farm fields.