5. - 1 Peter 3:9
"Do not repay evil with evil, or insult with insult, but with blessing, because to this you were called so that you may inherit a blessing." [NIV]
1. Silences in passage/challenge to a historical Jesus:
Jesus taught to "turn the other cheek".
2. Relevancy within context:
In 1 Peter, there are at least 15 quotations of old testament books, and only twice is it even indicated that they are from another source. In those 2 occasions the author simply writes "it is written", without any further identification. Shouldn't a reference to these sources also seem natural in such a context both to strengthen the authority of the action being urged by the writer, and to honor the OT author as a source? So, for this specific case of 1 Peter, it isn't out of context to not mention a teaching from Jesus. With regard to the silence of the exact phrase "turn the other cheek", we don't know that the author of 1 Peter found it as captivating a phrase as we do. The intent of the teaching is still closely matched.
3. Related information in other early writings:
This has been addressed in previous questions.
4. Conclusion
Since the author of 1 Peter was not fond of attributing teachings to their sources, I see little reason for us to expect him to do so for the passage in question. I addressed the general issue in previous questions.
|
